Georgia Manufacturing Survey Points to Profit and Wage Benefits for Innovation

*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************

Contact

Contact
Sidebar Content
No sidebar content submitted.
Summaries

Summary Sentence:

No summary sentence submitted.

Full Summary:

Georgia manufacturers that compete based on innovation in products and processes -- rather than on low cost -- earn higher profits and benefit from higher wages, a new Georgia Institute of Technology survey has found.

Researchers from Georgia Tech's Economic Development Institute (EDI) and School of Public Policy found that on average, annual wages were $10,000 higher at innovative manufacturing firms and returns on sales were almost a full percentage point higher.
However, a majority of Georgia manufacturers are competing based on cost rather than innovation. According to EDI researcher Jan Youtie, that's a bad sign because companies competing on low cost are vulnerable to competition from international producers with even lower costs.
The study also showed that more than half of Georgia's manufacturers underwent major changes in strategy or structure in the last two years, and that company concerns have shifted from information technology to marketing and new product development -- with nearly two-thirds of manufacturers now improving or developing new products.
"What was disturbing in this survey is that even more of our manufacturers competed on low price than had taken this approach in the last survey, when we were in a growth economy," said Youtie. "So when faced with a stressful economic situation, rather than innovating their way out, they are trying to get out of it by dropping their prices. That's not a good long-term strategy for global competition.
Researchers defined innovative companies as those that were developing new products or processes, improving products or processes, or changing organizationally. Researcher Philip Shapira, a professor in the Georgia Tech School of Public Policy, notes that innovation isn't restricted to companies considered to be "high technology."
"There can be innovative companies in traditional sectors such as textiles, food and apparel," he said. "It may be that they use these process and organizational methods to give themselves leverage in the marketplace in order to distinguish themselves from other companies."

Related Links

Additional Information

Groups

Research Horizons

Categories
No categories were selected.
Related Core Research Areas
No core research areas were selected.
Newsroom Topics
No newsroom topics were selected.
Keywords
No keywords were submitted.
Status
  • Created By: Matthew Nagel
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Jan 21, 2003 - 8:00pm
  • Last Updated: Oct 7, 2016 - 11:03pm