Kosal on Biological Weapons Verification in the 21st Century

*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************

Contact

Bernard Gourley
Sam Nunn School of International Affairs
Contact Bernard Gourley
404-894-5601

Sidebar Content
No sidebar content submitted.
Summaries

Summary Sentence:

Discussions at 7th Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference

Full Summary:

As part of the BioWeapons Prevention Project (BWPP)'s RevCon Project, INTA Assistant Professor Margaret E. Kosal was invited to contribute to a series of invited online discussions on issues related to the 7th Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Review Conference.

Media

As part of the BioWeapons Prevention Project (BWPP)'s RevCon Project, INTA Assistant Professor Margaret E. Kosal was invited to contribute to a series of invited online discussions on issues related to the 7th Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Review Conference.

Her commentary on "The role of biological verification as part of 21st century international security strategy" was published last week (http://www.bwpp.org/revcon-verification.html). In the article, she explores the role (and limitations) of biological weapons verification, particularly in context of the UN-backed UNSCOM and UNMOVIC verification missions to Iraq following the first Gulf War and the relationship of those efforts to the decision to invade Iraq in March 2003. The relationship of biological verification to broader strategic postures, such as deterrence, is also considered.

Kosal writes "during the time UNSCOM and UNMOVIC were operating in Iraq there was no evidence of new biological weapons research or development. At the same time, the limits of monitoring and onsite verification were substantive and significant enough in the minds of people inside and outside of political institutions â€" on both sides of the Atlantic â€" to generate doubt and uncertainty. The US and those allies who supported Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) hedged on the side on uncertainty. If one wants verification to be strategically significant a priori rather than post-invasion, resolving those uncertainties and making them significant for the broader strategic context must be achieved."

 

Related Links

Additional Information

Groups

Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts

Categories
Institute and Campus, Student and Faculty, Computer Science/Information Technology and Security, Energy, Life Sciences and Biology, Military Technology, Nanotechnology and Nanoscience, Research, Physics and Physical Sciences
Related Core Research Areas
No core research areas were selected.
Newsroom Topics
No newsroom topics were selected.
Keywords
Biological weapons, Biotechnology, bioterrorism, BioWeapons Prevention Project, BWC, chemical weapons, CISTP, cognitive science, Counterinsurgency, emerging technology, IAC, INTA, international security, Kosal, Margaret E. Kosal, margaret kosal, nanoscience, Nanotechnology, National Security, neuroscience, nuclear terrorism, Nuclear Weapons, unconventional weapons, verification
Status
  • Created By: Jene Gladstone
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Sep 14, 2011 - 8:00pm
  • Last Updated: Oct 7, 2016 - 11:10pm