*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Title: Exploring the Affordances of Physical and Digital Design in Computer Science Education
Date: Tuesday, November 29th
Time: 3pm - 5pm EST
Location: In-Person: TSRB 222, Virtual: Zoom Link (Meeting Code: 969 3595 0299)
Michael J. Johnson
Ph.D. Computer Science
School of Interactive Computing
Georgia Institute of Technology
Committee:
Dr. Betsy DiSalvo (Advisor) - School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
Dr. Jessica Roberts- School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
Dr. Judith Uchidiuno - School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
Dr. Kayla DesPortes - Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University
Dr. Mark Guzdial - Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Michigan
Abstract:
Physical computing is a growing field of computer science education as more and more educators and researchers uncover its applicability and uses. The promise of tangible artifacts providing an immersive educational experience is both exciting and rewarding and has led to significant contributions to learning theory through construction, problem-solving, and multimodal learning. Likewise, numerous screen-based computing environments remain in popular use today and provide a multitude of mediums through which learners may engage in computational thinking (e.g., video games and music making). This brings forth the question: how does learning computer science differ between the modalities of physical and screen-based computing?
The work presented in this proposal explores the nature of physical computing and screen-based computing activities to uncover the benefits of each, while also making note of their shortcomings that may hinder learning. I posit that the comparison of digital and physical design in CS learning interventions will yield key information on how each modality can be most effectively applied to curriculum design. I explore this idea within two learning environments for high school students: BridgeUP STEM and CWP 2.0. My aim for this work is to contribute an understanding of the affordances and drawbacks of physical and screen-based computing and to propose methods of improving learning through each modality with knowledge of the other.
