*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Atlanta, GA | Posted: April 5, 2021
Renay San Miguel
Communications Officer II/Science Writer
College of Sciences
404-894-5209
Summary Sentence:
School of Biological Sciences professor Soojin Yi and her global team have uncovered new findings on the evolution of DNA methylation
Full Summary:
It's one of the most important processes for the development of the human brain, but science is still learning about DNA methylation. A School of Biological Sciences professor and her research team have uncovered some new information about how this process evolved in humans.
"Charles Bell Anatomy of the Brain, c. 1802" (Wikimedia Commons, Shaheen Lakhan)
Soojin YiIt may not be a process that most people are familiar with, but DNA methylation is very important to brain evolution. It’s viewed as a critical regulatory mechanism implicated in cognitive development, learning, memory, and disease. That regulation includes gene expression, which happens when DNA instructions are converted into a functional product, namely messenger RNA molecules, which provide templates for proteins.
A School of Biological Sciences professor who specializes in molecular and genomic evolution has uncovered some new information about how DNA methylation evolved in the human brain — and how that compares to brains of some of our primate relatives. She and a global team of researchers have published their findings, “Evolution of DNA methylation in the human brain” in Nature Communications.
“The large and complex brain is a distinguishing trait of the human lineage,” explains Soojin Yi, who directs the Yi Lab of Comparative Genomics and Epigenomics at Georgia Tech. “Scientists have been very interested in finding genetic and gene expression changes that are associated with the evolution of human brains.”
DNA methylation is a biological process by which methyl groups — organic compounds made up of three hydrogen atoms and a carbon atom — are added to DNA, which in turn sets off molecular processes to help regulate gene expression and other genetic factors that are necessary in healthy brains and nervous systems. When something goes wrong with DNA methylation, it can lead to certain diseases, including cancer and neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia.
“To understand the contribution of DNA methylation to human brain-specific gene regulation and disease susceptibility, it is necessary to extend our knowledge of evolutionary changes in DNA methylation during human brain evolution,” Yi says.
Science has long known about the DNA methylation connection to certain conditions, but the evolutionary aspect has so far been largely unexplored. “Previous studies used bulk tissues, while DNA methylation is known to vary substantially between cell types,” Yi shares, so her team, including the paper’s co-corresponding author Genevieve Konopka’s lab at UT Southwestern Medical Center, focused on the search for cell-type-specific epigenetic (gene-activity-changing) marks, including DNA methylation and histone (basic protein) modifications. Those are implicated in cell-type-specific gene expression and disease susceptibility in humans.
“Data from bulk tissues can be biased toward specific cell types and consequently, underpowered to detect cell-type-specific evolutionary changes,” Yi explains. “Therefore, to fully understand the role of DNA methylation in human brain evolution, it is necessary to study cell-type-specific changes of DNA methylation.”
Yi and her team found suitable samples for chimpanzees and macaques in the specimen archives of the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory University. “We also separated neurons and oligodendrocytes (which forms the protective sheaths for neural transmission) from bulk brain samples, so that we can study cell-type specific patterns of DNA methylation,” Yi says.
“We found that the human brains are particularly heavily methylated compared to chimpanzee and rhesus macaque brains — both in neurons and oligodendrocytes.”
Yi and her team found that some positions that have unique patterns of DNA methylation in human brains were previously implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases including schizophrenia.
“Our work extends the knowledge of the unique roles of . . . methylation in human brain evolution, and offers a new framework for investigating the role of the epigenome evolution in connecting the genome to brain development, function, and diseases.”
Yi’s research team included colleagues from the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, and the Department of Pathology, at Emory University; the Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Bizkaia Technology Park, Spain; The Department of Neuroscience at UT Southwestern Medical Center; the Center for Medical Research and Education, Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Japan; the Schizophrenia Research Project, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan; and the College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, South Korea.
For human samples, UT Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) has determined that as this research was conducted using post-mortem specimens, the project does not meet the definition of human subjects research and does not require IRB approval and oversight. Non-human primate samples were obtained from archival, post-mortem brain tissue opportunistically collected from subjects that died from natural causes, and following procedures approved by the Emory Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accordance with federal and institutional guidelines for the humane care and use of experimental animals. No living great apes were used in this study.
