Ph.D. Proposal Oral Exam - Mohit Prabhushankar

*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************

Event Details
  • Date/Time:
    • Monday March 8, 2021 - Tuesday March 9, 2021
      3:00 pm - 4:59 pm
  • Location: https://gatech.bluejeans.com/5145525300
  • Phone:
  • URL:
  • Email:
  • Fee(s):
    N/A
  • Extras:
Contact
No contact information submitted.
Summaries

Summary Sentence: Ph.D. Proposal Oral Exam - Mohit Prabhushankar

Full Summary: No summary paragraph submitted.

Title:  Contrastive Reasoning in Neural Networks

Committee: 

Dr. AlRegib, Advisor     

Dr. Davenport, Chair

Dr. Riedl

Abstract: The objective of the proposed research is to rethink the inductive nature of reasoning in neural networks, and hence, provide contextual explanations to a network’s decision and address its robustness capabilities. Neural networks represent data as projections on trained weights in a high dimensional manifold. The trained weights act as a knowledge base consisting of causal class dependencies. Inference built on features that identify dependencies within this manifold is termed as inductive feed-forward inference. This is a classical cause-to-effect inference model that is widely used because of its simple mathematical functionality and ease of operation. Nevertheless, feed-forward models do not generalize well to untrained situations. To alleviate this generalization challenge, we propose using an effect-to-cause inference model that falls under the abductive reasoning framework. Here, the features represent the change from existing weight dependencies given a certain effect. We term this change as contrast and the ensuing inference mechanism as contrastive inference. The proposed research tackles contrastive reasoning and inference in three phases: 1) We formalize the structure of contrastive reasons, 2) We provide a simple mechanism to extract contrastive reasons from any pre-trained neural network, and 3) Use extracted contrastive reasons to make robust decisions. We also provide representational and explanatory insight into the contrastive reasoning scheme for the applications including robustness to distortions, domain shift, image quality assessment and human visual saliency.

Additional Information

In Campus Calendar
No
Groups

ECE Ph.D. Proposal Oral Exams

Invited Audience
Public
Categories
Other/Miscellaneous
Keywords
Phd proposal, graduate students
Status
  • Created By: Daniela Staiculescu
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Feb 25, 2021 - 11:52am
  • Last Updated: Feb 25, 2021 - 11:52am