*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Think back to the last time you graded student work. How long did it take? Think about the work that you put into preparing and presenting information that is new to your students. A lot of time, there, too?
What if we told you that your students can actually learn more and learn better if you were to teach less and grade less? And they would act dishonestly less often, to boot? There has to be a catch, right? Well, no.
As instructors and course designers, we often find ourselves assigning (and then grading) mountains of assessment work, in the belief that learner skills need to be scored and demonstrated by numerical measurements of mastery at every step of the learning process. This leads to test fatigue for learners and grading fatigue for instructors.
Together, we’ll explore ways to design learning interactions and assessments in order to provide learners with greater engagement, deeper application of course concepts, and meaningful demonstration of course learning outcomes—all while reducing the grading- and work-load for instructors.
This interactive webinar session presents a framework of expert-level teaching practices, all backed by the science of how our brains learn. Adopting one of three approaches that de-emphasizes numerical grades in your teaching approach can help to make learners more active, curious, and engaged, all while reducing your workload as an instructor—and preserving the rigor of the activities in which you ask learners to engage.
You’ll discover how specifications grading, ungrading, contract grading, authentic assessment, social/emotional learning, desirable difficulty, and intentional failure in learning—and their absence—contribute to the emotional roots of why students cheat and act dishonestly. You’ll explore tow common assessment practices that you can stop doing (and save yourself hours of wasted time in the bargain). After participating in this session, you will be able to …
Presented by:
Thomas J. Tobin, PhD, MSLS, PMP, MOT, CPACC is the Program Area Director for Distance Teaching & Learning on the Learning Design, Development, & Innovation (LDDI) team at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, as well as an internationally recognized speaker and author on technology-mediated education. His books include
