Evaluating the Impact of Federal Science Investments Policy: Cozzens and Hicks Present at White House Conference

*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************

Contact

Rebecca Keane  404-894-1720

Sidebar Content
No sidebar content submitted.
Summaries

Summary Sentence:

No summary sentence submitted.

Full Summary:

The federal government's huge investment in science and technology is giving rise to new research that evaluates the impact of nationally-funded R&D programs.  Two Georgia Tech public policy professors are leading researchers in the field and presented this month at a White House conference on the subject.

Media
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy Office of Science and Technology Policy
    (image/png)
  • Susan Cozzens Susan Cozzens
    (image/jpeg)
  • Diana Hicks Diana Hicks
    (image/jpeg)

The federal government's huge investment in science and technology is giving rise to new research that evaluates the impact of nationally-funded R&D programs.  Two Georgia Tech public policy professors are leading researchers in the field and presented this month at a White House conference on the subject.

In September, U.S. House of Representatives Research and Science Education Subcommittee Chairman, Daniel Lipinski said, "Given the magnitude of the federal investment in science and technology, there is a need for objective analysis and evaluation of federally funded R&D programs. And given the size of the budget deficit, Congressional decision makers need the best information possible to make sure we are spending taxpayer dollars optimally."

Lipinski's remarks highlighted the science of science policy (SoSP), an emerging field of interdisciplinary research that is promoted by the White House Office of Science and Technology's SoSP initiative and receives funding from the National Science Foundation.   Associate Dean of Research and Public Policy Professor Susan Cozzens, and Professor and Chair of the School of Public Policy Diana Hicks are leading researchers in the field, which is providing a scientifically rigorous basis from which policy makers and researchers can assess the impacts of the nation's scientific and engineering enterprise, improve their understanding of its dynamics, and assess likely outcomes.

Cozzens and Hicks were invited presenters at the White House Office of Science and Technology’s (OSTP) Workshop on the Science of Science Measurement December 2-3, which included researchers from Harvard, MIT Sloan School of Management, and the University of Michigan. The workshop was sponsored by the OSTP’s National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), a Cabinet-level Council chaired by President Obama that is charged with establishing “clear national goals for Federal science and technology investments in a broad array of areas that span virtually all the mission areas of the executive branch.”  Its scientific committee included members of key federal policy and research funding groups including National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Institute of Health, Department of Defense, the National Science Foundation, the Environmental Protection Agency, BEA, and the Department of Education.

Cozzens and Michele Snoeck (Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay) presented "Knowledge to Policy: Contributing to the Measurement of Social, Health, and Environmental Benefits ". Hicks presented "Systemic data infrastructure for innovation policy " during the segment focused on Technology Development and Deployment.

The workshop was intended to “create a dialogue between the Federal science and technology (S&T) agencies and the research community about relevant models, tools, and data that advance scientific measurement in key areas of national S&T interest:  economic benefits; social, health and environmental benefits; S&T workforce development; and technology development and deployment. Secondly, the workshop was to identify a joint Science of Science Policy research agenda for the Federal S&T agencies and the research community.

Read more about the workshop and watch videos at  http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sosp/

Additional Information

Groups

Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts

Categories
Congressional Testimony
Related Core Research Areas
No core research areas were selected.
Newsroom Topics
No newsroom topics were selected.
Keywords
D.C., public policy, science policy, washington
Status
  • Created By: Rebecca Keane
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Dec 16, 2010 - 12:04pm
  • Last Updated: Oct 7, 2016 - 11:07pm