*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Atlanta, GA | Posted: December 10, 2018
Summary Sentence:
Innovative work ties labor union density and pollution emissions.
Full Summary:
No summary paragraph submitted.
Allen HydeAssistant professor of sociology Allen Hyde recently published a journal article in Environmental Sociology with coauthor Todd Vachon about the relationship between labor unions and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 16 affluent nations from 1990 to 2010.
Typically, debates about jobs and environmental protection are often framed in a zero-sum fashion such that what is good for jobs is bad for the environment and vice versa. As a result, labor unions are often depicted as being protective of their workers' jobs at all costs, including the risk of environmental degradation. Given the rise of alliances between labor and environmental activists on the Left and the burgeoning union platform of a "just transition," they wanted to explore if the old "jobs vs. environment" framework holds true for labor unions on average in affluent countries.
They found that, net of controls, labor union density is associated with less GHG emissions, net of a robust set of controls, and that this relationship becomes stronger (more negative) when unions have a seat at the table in policy making along with corporate and government leaders in corporatist systems of governance.
Overall, this article contributes to our understanding of the role of labor unions in addressing climate change. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23251042.2018.1544107
