*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Ph.D. Thesis Defense Announcement
Adoption of Performance Measures in Regional Transportation Planning: Current Practice and
Lessons for Future Applications
By
Alice Grossman
Advisor:
Dr. Randall Guensler (CEE)
Committee Members:
Dr. Kari Watkins (CEE), Dr. Catherine Ross (CRP), Dr. Michael Meyer (WSP), Dr. Joshua Schank
(LA Metro)
Date & Time: Friday, January 12th, at 2:00pm
Location: Mason 2228
. Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (MPOs) have been tasked by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal
legislation to develop short- and long-term transportation plans that include performance measures. Measures required by
legislation are standard, uniform indicators for specific projects and entire metropolitan regions, and lead to MPOs implementing
performance analysis serving as evidence of the productive use of taxpayer dollars toward public accountability. Agencies are
in the process of responding to federal rulemaking in implementing and incorporating the required safety, infrastructure,
congestion, system reliability, freight, and environmental performance measures.
This dissertation research includes a nation-wide survey and four urban transportation planning case studies. A survey
response of 183 (45%) of the 405 MPOs across the country reveals when agencies began collecting federally mandated
performance measures as well as additional non-mandated measures, how performance measures link to regional and state
goals and priorities, what factors currently impede agencies from adopting performance-based planning practices, and where
agencies are looking for examples, best practices, and data sharing. Only 12 out of the 183 responding agencies reported using
all of the federally required measures. Larger MPOs are generally adopting more measures and introducing them earlier, and
agencies located in the Northeast and Western states (where many of the larger regions are located) are generally ahead of
regions in the South in implementing performance-based planning. Medium-sized MPOs show no discernable trend in
responding to the federal requirements and have not adopted as many additional non-federally mandated performance
measures as larger MPOs. Four case studies indicate the characteristics of MPO adoption of performance measures and
provide examples of best practices. Many agencies reported a lack of resources – both monetary and in personnel –
contributing to their inability to quickly and efficiently adopt new data-driven practices. Case studies reveal the varying levels of
coordination between MPOs and state DOTs. Agencies demonstrating best practices in incorporating performance-based
planning into their long-range plans in recent years are only now including the methods in short-term Transportation
Improvement Programs (TIPs). The survey results and case studies provide the most comprehensive data and research to date
of MPO response to the MAP-21 performance measure mandates indicating state of the practice across the country and
presenting best practice models.
