Metacognitive Regulation: How Undergraduate Students Evaluate and Adjust their Approaches to Learning in Biology

*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************

Event Details
  • Date/Time:
    • Thursday November 2, 2017
      10:55 am
  • Location: Room 1005, Roger A. and Helen B. Krone Engineered Biosystems Building (EBB), 950 Atlantic Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30332
  • Phone:
  • URL:
  • Email:
  • Fee(s):
    N/A
  • Extras:
Contact

Chrissy Spencer, Ph.D.

Summaries

Summary Sentence: A Biological Sciences Seminar by Julie Dangremond Stanton, Ph.D.

Full Summary: No summary paragraph submitted.

Media
  • Julie Dangremond Stanton Julie Dangremond Stanton
    (image/jpeg)

Julie Dangremond Stanton, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Cellular Biology
University of Georgia

Abstract
Students with awareness and control of their own thinking can learn more and perform better than students who are not metacognitive. Metacognitive regulation is how you control your thinking in order to learn. It includes the skill of evaluation, which is the ability to appraise your approaches to learning and modify your plans based on those appraisals. Metacognitive skills can have a significant impact on learning and performance, but many undergraduate students are still developing these abilities. We need to understand the important changes that occur as students acquire these skills in order to help them develop their metacognition more effectively. We used the task of preparing for an exam as a way to explore the metacognitive skills undergraduate students use to learn biology. We analyzed qualitative data from students' self-evaluation assignments and research interviews. From this analysis, we proposed a continuum of metacognitive development in introductory biology students. We also gained insights into when, why, and how upper-division biology students evaluate their approaches to learning, and the barriers these students face when they try to change their plans based on their evaluations. These data have implications for how undergraduate students learn biology. We offer evidence-based suggestions for instructors who want to help improve student metacognition.

Host: Chrissy Spencer

Additional Information

In Campus Calendar
Yes
Groups

School of Biological Sciences

Invited Audience
Faculty/Staff, Public, Graduate students, Undergraduate students
Categories
Seminar/Lecture/Colloquium
Keywords
School of Biological Sciences Seminar, Chrissy Spencer, Julie Dangremond Stanton, Julie Stanton
Status
  • Created By: Jasmine Martin
  • Workflow Status: Published
  • Created On: Sep 27, 2017 - 5:11pm
  • Last Updated: Sep 29, 2017 - 5:08pm