*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Atlanta, GA | Posted: September 26, 2017
Summary Sentence:
Next Thursday Wayne Drews will defend his Ph.D. thesis on impacts of innovation and governmental policies on the telecommunications industry from the 1950s to 1996.
Full Summary:
No summary paragraph submitted.
Wayne DrewsOctober 5, 2017
Starting at 9:30 AM
OCE, Room 104
Wayne Drews will defend his Ph.D. thesis entitled Evolution of United States Telecommunications: Policy, Technology, and Competition at the Bell Operating Companies, 1952-1996.
Abstract:
This dissertation focuses on impacts of technology innovation and governmental policies on the telecommunications industry from the 1950s until the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Special attention is given to the local Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) and to the changes initially driven by competition in Customer Premises Equipment (CPE). Ultimately, it was the federal court’s decision in January 1982, resulting in AT&T’s divestiture of the BOCs, which permanently changed the landscape. This study begins well before 1982 to consider the BOCs’ tradition of control over all telephone services and the significance of losing that control.
The terminal, subscriber loop, central office switches, and interoffice trunks had for many years been the exclusive province of the regulated telephone operating company. Communications lines and terminals were indivisible and installation of any subscriber-owned equipment violated the federal and state tariffs and carried with it the penalty of service disconnection. The demise of that tradition occurred because of technology evolution, initiatives of competitors, changes in customer requirements, BOC responses, and ultimately the actions of governmental bodies. To fully appreciate impacts of the court-ordered divestiture and the ramifications of various adjustments necessary by the divested BOCs, mandated that this study extends into the years of the mid-nineties.
Even though most historical attention rests with AT&T Headquarters, the BOCs were also key to the processes. Archives of the BOCs were explored and provided details previously unstudied by historians. Other primary sources were media accounts from the period, proceedings of governmental agencies and industry forums, and interviews of individuals involved in the events. Impacts on technical standards were investigated as modifications were critical to success but difficult to achieve. Ironically, AT&T’s attitude of invincibility, due to its size and importance to society, was a significant factor in the loss of their monopoly position. In the end, a breakup would be done and the open competition delivered significant benefits.
Advisor:
Dr. Steve Usselman
Committee Members:
Dr. John Krige
Dr. Doug Flamming
Dr. William Winders
Dr. Richard Barke (Public Policy)
All are welcome to attend.
