*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
Atlanta, GA | Posted: August 14, 2017
Rebecca Keane
Director of Communications
rebecca.keane@iac.gatech.edu
404.894.1720
Summary Sentence:
Evan Mistur, a third-year doctoral student in the School of Public Policy, has his single-authored article published in the Review of Energy Re
Full Summary:
Evan Mistur, a third-year doctoral student in the School of Public Policy, has his single-authored article titled “Health and Energy Preferences: Rethinking the Social Acceptance of Energy Systems in the United States” published in the Review of Energy Research and Social Science (an Elsevier journal).
Evan MisturEvan Mistur, a third-year doctoral student in the School of Public Policy, has his single-authored article titled “Health and Energy Preferences: Rethinking the Social Acceptance of Energy Systems in the United States” published in the Review of Energy Research and Social Science (an Elsevier journal).
Abstract:
Does a person’s health impact their opinions about energy sources? This article tests whether people with health problems prefer less physically harmful energy sources using data from a 2011 survey of 1,382 U.S. residents. 19 percent of respondents reported their health as “only fair” or worse, and a smaller proportion of these people supported coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy than of respondents who had “good” or “excellent” health. The analysis finds significant differences in opinion by gender, age, and other demographic characteristics. These findings are consistent with previous U.S. studies on energy preferences. After controlling for political party, ideology, sex, age, education, race, religion, and geographical region, this article shows that people with health problems are not more likely to back renewable energy, but that they are significantly less likely to support coal, natural gas, and nuclear power. These results may be utilized by a variety of policy-oriented groups. They can help shape interest groups’ advocacy strategies, advise decisions about what communities to avoid when developing energy facilities, and guide policymakers’ attempts to initiate energy policy that will be supported by the public by increasing understanding about how energy preferences are formed.
