*********************************
There is now a CONTENT FREEZE for Mercury while we switch to a new platform. It began on Friday, March 10 at 6pm and will end on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. No new content can be created during this time, but all material in the system as of the beginning of the freeze will be migrated to the new platform, including users and groups. Functionally the new site is identical to the old one. webteam@gatech.edu
*********************************
THE SCHOOL OF CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Under the provisions of the regulations for the degree
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
on Monday, November 10, 2014
4:00 – 6:00 PM
in Architecture (East) 217
will be held the
DISSERTATION FINAL DEFENSE
for
Barbara Faga
“FORMERS VERSUS ZONERS
HOW AND WHY COMMUNITIES SHIFT TO FORM-BASED ZONING”
The Examiners Are:
Dr. Catherine L. Ross (Chair)
Dr. Nancey Green Leigh
Dr. Bruce Stiftel
Dr. Frederick Steiner
Dr. Gary Hack
Faculty and students are invited to attend this examination.
Abstract:
City design has long been recognized as predicated on power. Planners have the power to regulate the use and form of privately owned land—an enormous task. Planning is power; zoning is the foundation of city planning. The caliber of cities’ future development hinges on zoning. Over the last fifteen years, communities have been divesting themselves of their historic Euclidean zoning in favor of the newer concept of form-based code. However, changing an entire zoning code is an immense project that requires a massive investment of motivation, time, perseverance and money. Does changing code provide an answer to undesirable consequences of Euclidean zoning, or are the claims of form-based code advocates correct and their code the panacea for everything wrong with planning and development? This is a sweeping question and one that is asked in hundreds of planning offices by planners, urban designers, politicians and their communities. The primary question is why and how communities change from conventional Euclidean zoning to form-based code. This research examines the state of practice and the impact of form-based code on zoning. Issues critical to an examination of the theory and practice aspects of this investigation includes key questions: What motivates change? What difference does it make? Who are the primary motivators for change? What is the comparative analysis and the basis for change and the impact of form-based code?
Two protocols, including online surveys of planning practitioners and case studies of Cincinnati, Denver and Miami, are used to investigate the intended, and often unintended, outcomes and consequences that emerge with changes to zoning within an established community.
